Surendra Kumar @ Marai Singh @ Marai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26782 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1090 Year-2017 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Surendra Kumar @ Marai Singh @ Marai S/o Musafir Yadav @ Ram Parekha Rai, R/o Vill.- Lakhan Tola, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Uday Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1090 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 147, 149, 341, 283, 427 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation made in the First Information Report, on account of Bharat Band Call given by the Rashtriya Janata Dal and Balu Mafia, the vehicular movement was blocked and they went for rampage, there were 100-150 persons were there.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Surendra Kumar @ Marai Singh @ Marai, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26782 of 2018(2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additioal Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 1090 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.

This Court has granted the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that if the petitioner is found involved in such kind incident in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T