Sarju Yadav @ Sarju Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26833 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2018 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Sarju Yadav @ Sarju Singh age - 45 Years (Male) son of Basudev Yadav Resident of Village- Khajurbanna, P.S.- Shakurbad, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 149, 323, 307, 379, 341, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 104 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation of committing assault on the head of the informant with iron rod. There is case and counter case relating to the land dispute between the parties who are Gotias. Co-accused persons, namely, Shayam Singh @ Shayam Singh Yadav and Basudeo Singh; and Vikash Yadav have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 29.11.2018 and 09.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54787 of 2018 and Cr. Misc. No. 78524 of 2018 respectively.
4. Having regard to the nature of accusations, gravity of offence alleged as well as the injuries caused to the informant being grievous in nature attributed to the assault by the petitioner as it transpires from the injury report enclosed in the case diary which has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26833 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/2 been taken note of by the learned Sessions Judge, Jehanabad in ABP No. 1417 of 2018, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
5. If the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail before the learned trial Court the same shall be considered on its own merit in accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any observation in the present order.
BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T