Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30735/2024bail granted

Rajvir Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-20Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30735 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2021 Thana- BHEJA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Rajvir Chaupal Son of Sonai Chaupal Resident of Village- Kharik, P.ORahua, Sangram, P.S- Bheja, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 62 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 354, 379, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

4. The informant alleges that on 09.10.2021, the accused persons including the petitioner came variously armed to his house and started abusing and on protest it is alleged that co-accused Raghuveer Chaupal assaulted the informant by farsa causing injury on his head and when his wife came to save him she was assaulted by Bachhe Lal Cahupal and the accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30735 of 2024(2) dt.20-07-2024 2/2 persons also torn her clothe and took away cash and jewelry.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the injured is against Raghuveer Chaupal and the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 62 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. Accordingly, the application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) annpurna/- U T