Heeraman Yadav @ Bindeshwari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28347 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2025 Thana- KORMA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

Heeraman Yadav @ Bindeshwari Yadav S/o Suro Yadav 2.

Ramjanam Yadav @ Ram Janam Kumar S/o Rajaram Yadav 3.

Rajaram Yadav S/o Suro Yadav R/o vill - Gagaur, P.S. - Korma, Distt.- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinkar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renuka Ratnakar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard Mr. Dinkar Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Renuka Ratnakar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Korma P.S. Case No. 02/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103, 61, 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners have committed murder of the husband of the informant. Further allegation is that reason behind the commission of murder is because the son of the petitioner no.1 got married on the recommendation of the deceased husband of the informant and from there on their relationship became strained.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28347 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Specific allegation of firing upon the husband of the informant is against co-accused Mannu Yadav and Ajit Kumar. Petitioners have clean antecedents and petitioner no.1 is in custody since 06.01.2025, whereas petitioners no.2 and 3 are in custody since 27.02.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the bail prayer.

6. Having considered the rival submission made on behalf of the parties, I find that there is direct allegation against the petitioner no.1 and as such, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no.1 on regular bail.

7. So far as petitioners no.2 and 3 are concerned, considering the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against them and they are having clean antecedents, the learned District Court is directed to release the petitioners no.2 and 3, above named, on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Sheikhpura/ Successor Court in connection with Korma P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28347 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 Case No. 02/2025 subject to the following conditions: (i) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(ii) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court. (iii) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (iv) If the petitioners are found involved in similar nature of offence, after their release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel their bail bond.

(v) The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners no.2 and 3, as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against them as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T