Smt.Shashi Bala v. Rajendra Kumar Ranjan And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No 177 of 1998 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2208 of 96 ====================================================== Smt Shashi Bala, wife of late Sachidanand Prasad, at present residing in Flat No 406, Devendra Lok Apartment, Kankarbagh, Police Station - Kankarbagh, Patna Town .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1 Rajendra Kumar Ranjan, son of late Lokan Mandal, resident of Flat No 404, Devendra Lok Apartment, situated at Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Police Station - Kankarbagh, Patna 2 The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, Patna 3 The Patna Regional Development Authority through its Vice-Chairman 4 M/s Mahendra Developers Private Limited, Kankarbagh, Police Station - Kankarbagh, District - Patna through its Managing Director Shri Prabhat Kumar Singh .... .... Respondent/s WITH Civil Review No 178 of 1998 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2208 of 96 ====================================================== 1 Dr (Mrs) Binod Kumari Sharma, wife of Shri Ram Udeshwar Sharma 2 Ram Udeshwar Sharma, son of late Harihar Singh, residents of Thana Road, Bhagwan Bazar, District - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
5 Rajendra Kumar Ranjan, son of late Lokan Mandal, resident of Flat No 404, Devendra Lok Apartment, situated at Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Police Station - Kankarbagh, Patna 6 The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Department, Patna 7 The Patna Regional Development Authority through its Vice-Chairman 8 M/s Mahendra Developers Private Limited, Kankarbagh, Police Station - Kankarbagh, District - Patna through its Managing Director Shri Prabhat Kumar Singh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) 21-06-2016 Inspite of repeated calls, no one appears to press
Patna High Court C. REV. No.177 of 1998 (10) dt.21-06-2016 2/2 these applications.
We have seen the records of LPA No 691 of 1996 which arose out of CWJC No 2208 of 1996 disposed of on 25.06.1996. It is this order passed in the writ petition which is sought to be impugned. The LPA was ultimately dismissed by this Bench on 16.12.2015, as not pressed.
In such circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss both these review applications, as not pressed. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) U M.E.H./-