Suryamani v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27527 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4570 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Suryamani son of Sri Krishna Prasad Singh resident of D.V.S.L. - 8 Dev Villa, Post Office - Mango, P.S. - Mango, Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum, Jharkhand, Pin - 832110 and at present resident of 8/5 Employee Provident Fund Sansthan, Snehdeep Commercial Complex, NH - 8, Gujrat Industrial Development Corporation, Bapi, Gujrat, Pin - 396195. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Kumari Anupam Singh wife of Shri Suryamani and daughter of Shri Rambriksh Singh resident of 407 B, Hope Mahindra Apartment, Munnachak, Kankarbagh, P.O. - Lohiya Nagar, P.S. - Patrakar Nagar, Patna - 20. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27527 of 2018(2) dt.04-05-2018 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate X, Patna in connection with Complaint case No.4570(c) of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T