Vinay Kumar Pappu And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3046 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Vinay Kumar Pappu S/o Late Dr. S.N. Roy Yadav, Resident of MohallaGoriya Toli Station Road, Police Station- Kotwali, Post Office- GPO, District- Patna.

2. Nitin Nabin (Member of Legislative Assembly), son of Late Navin Kishore Prasad Sinha, 137 Member of Legislative Assembly Flat, Beerchand Patel Path, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District- Patna.

3. Mukesh Kumar Jain, S/o Sri Shanti Lal Jain, the Big Shop, 38 Hathua Market, Police Station- Pirbohar Thana, Post Office- Bankipur, Patna800004. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. Central Board of Film Certification (referred as Sensor Board), Bharat Bhawan, 91-E, Valkashwar Road, Mumbai 400006 represented through its Chair person.

3. The Chair Person, Sri Pahlaz Nihalani, Bharat Bhawan, 91-E, Valkashwar Road, Mumbai 400006.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Bharat Bhawan, 91-E, Valkashwar Road, Mumbai 400006.

5. Prakash Jha Production, a proprietorship concern, through its Proprietor Mr. Prakash Jha having its registered office at 201 Abhisek, Off New Link Road, Andheri West, Mumbai 400053.

6. Mr. Prakash Jha son of Sri Tej Nath Jha, resident of Village Barharwa, P.O. Turaha Palti, P.S.- Sirision, Anchal Chanpatia, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Thakur For the Union of India : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 19-02-2016 Heard Mr. Ajay Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the Central Government Counsel.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3046 of 2016 (2) dt.19-02-2016 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioners.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U