Patna High CourtMJC/4501/2014dismissed

Bhojpur Gramin Vikash Parishad Through Its Secretary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-25Mr. Justice Ramesh Kumar Datta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4501 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22109 of 2013 ====================================================== Bhojpur Gramin Vikash Parishad through its Secretary, Mohd. Aslam, son of Late Ainul Haque, resident of Mohalla- ward no.25 Machua Toli, Ara Nagar, District-Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sri Pravin Kishore, the Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

3. Sri Prabhakar Jha, the District Magistrate-cum-Chairman District Health Society, Kaimur, District-Kaimur.

4. Sri Krishna Balabh Singh, the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur, District-Kaimur.

5. Sri Vijay Kumar Himanshu, District Education Officer, Kaimur, DistrictKaimur. .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2016 A show cause is filed on behalf of the Civil Surgeoncum-Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua in which it is stated that the petitioner had been allegedly awarded the work during the period of the then Civil Surgeon, Dr. Uchhit Lal Mandal, during whose tenure, financial irregularity to the extent of Rs.4,17,25,000/- has been found on the basis of investigations made and two FIRs have been lodged against him and he has also been dismissed from service. It is further stated that such matters are still pending before the courts and it is not possible to decide the claim of the petitioner. In the said circumstances, an order on the claim of the petitioner dated 14.8.2015 has been passed by the Civil Surgeon stating the aforesaid facts.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the order under contempt appears to have been complied with.

The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed.

Patna High Court MJC No.4501 of 2014 (2) dt.25-11-2016 Needless to say that it shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate proceedings in accordance with law against the order that has been passed by the Civil Surgeon. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/- U