Mostt. Devki Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.768 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2415 of 2015 ====================================================== Mostt. Devki Devi, W/o Late Garbhu Yadav, resident of VillageChanapatti, Police Station- Supaul, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Md. Sohel, District Magistrate, Madhepura.

3. Sri Ritesh Pandey, Circle Officer, Golpara, Madhepura

4. Sri Mukeshwar Sharma, District Provident Officer, Madhpura. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. M.K. Sinha, SC1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 13-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is complaining that the opposite party has not complied the order dated 17.03.2015 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2415 of 2015, therein the Court has directed that as the amount of Provident Fund has not been paid to the petitioner on account of laches on the part of the respondents, she will entitled for up-to-date interest as per the Provident Fund Rules and with the above observation and direction, C.W.J.C. No. 2415 of 2015 was disposed of.

In pursuance thereof, the amount of Rs. 60,610/- has been credited to the account of the petitioner that includes up-to-

Patna High Court MJC No.768 of 2016 (2) dt.13-02-2017 date interest, so much so, as per the State, earlier also, the certain amount has been credited to the account of the petitioner. In such view of the matter, there is no purpose to keep the matter pending, but if the statement is found to be incorrect, the petitioner will have to file an application for getting this case revived.

With the above observation and direction, this petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U