Patna High CourtCWJC/15352/2012disposed

Dhirendra Pd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15352 of 2012 =========================================================== Dhirendra Prasad S/O Late Chendeshwar Prasad R/O Village- Mai, P.O.+P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Public Health And Engineering Deparatment, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary Public Health And Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Bihar, Patna

3. The Regional Chief Engineer Public Health and Engineering Department, Patna Zone, Govt. of Bihar, Bihar, Patna

4. The Superintending Engineer Public Health and Engineering Department, Rajbanshi Nagar, Govt. of Bihar, Bihar, Patna

5. The Executive Engineer Public Health and Engineering Department, P.H. Division, Hilsa, District- Nalanda .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. A. Ujjwal, SC-4 Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC-4 Mr. S.K. Mallick, AC to SC-4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-08-2016 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to provide the petitioner the site list of the project in respect of Agreement No. 10 F2 of 2009-10 executed between the petitioner and respondent no. 5; and to revise the rates of the project as per present price index and extend the time limitation for implementation of the project/contract in respect of the said agreement.

2. Despite repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15352 of 2012 dt.12-08-2016 2/2

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents states that the relevant agreement contemplated only for a period of six months for completion of the work in terms of order dated 19.01.2010 (Annexure-1), which has already elapsed.

4. In that view of the matter, the prayer in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time and no positive relief can be granted at this belated stage.

5. The application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/-BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date Transmission Date N/A