Anjani Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6596 of 2014 ===========================================================
1. Anjani Kumar Son Of Upendra Yadav Resident Of Village - Khemtarni Sthan, P.S. Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources, Government Of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resources New Secretariat, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai
4. The District Programme Officer, Lakhisarai
5. The Block Development Officer Surajgarha P.S. Surajgarha District Lakhisarai
6. The Then District Superintendent Of Education Cum Sub Divisional Education Officer, Lakhisarai
7. The Then Block Education Officer, Surajgarha Block, District - Lakhisarai
8. The Then Block Education Extension Officer, Surajgarha Block, District - Lakhisarai
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Mohammadpur Block - Surajgarha, P.S. Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai
10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Mohammadpur Block - Surajgarha, P.S. Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai
11. Chandan Kumar S/O Hazari Prasad Singh R/O Village - Kalyanpur, P.S. Barahiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai
12. Pushplata Kumari D/O Ghaneshwar Yadav R/O Village - Shaligrami, P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, Distt. - Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP 6 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-03-2016 Since the rule for appointment of Panchayat Teacher has undergone a change now and no person can be appointed on the post of a Panchayat Teacher till he clears the Teacher Eligibility Test, the Court will not interfere with the impugned order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority because it does not suffer
Patna High Court CWJC No.6596 of 2014 dt.16-03-2016 2/2 from any infirmity with regard to appointment of respondent no.11. The vacancy caused due to resignation of respondent no.11 will not automatically accrue in favour of the petitioner till he fulfils the requirement of passing the eligibility test now, which is mandatory.
Writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U