Patna High CourtC. REV./96/2022disposed

Priya Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-28The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.96 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21234 of 2021 ====================================================== Priya Ranjan son of Lal Bahadur Mehta, resident of Nonpar, Baisa, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul. Proprietor of M/s Sakshi Priya Enterprises, Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Supaul.

The Superintendent of Police, Supaul.

The Officer Incharge, Radhopur Police Station, Supaul. 6.

The Excise Inspector, Supaul.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-11-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "That the present review application is being filed to review the order dated 22.04.2022 passed by Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court comprising Hon'ble Chief Justice sitting with Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Kumar whereby and where under, the Hon'ble Division Bench has been pleased to disposed of writ in following terms.

In view of the amendment in Excise Act and same being applicable in pending cases, it shall be open to the petitioner to get his/ her house unsealed after making payment penalty in terms of the Rule

Patna High Court C. REV. No.96 of 2022(6) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 12(B) inserted by amending Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Rule 2021.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law if the need is so arise subsequently."

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instruction, states that, in view of the intervening developments, the present petition has become infructuous. As such, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. Prayer allowed.

Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U