Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23825/2020dismissed

Raju Rai @ Raju Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-03Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23825 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== RAJU RAI @ RAJU RAY S/O Bateshar Rai @ Bateshar Ray Resident of Village - Bishunpura, P.S. - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 15.04.2019 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 147 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 354, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 11.12.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 69665 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation of firing, which is general and omnibus in nature. In any event, the petitioner has suffered more than one year in custody since 15.04.2019.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23825 of 2020(3) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to take a different view of the matter. The petition stands dismissed.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

Chandran/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T