Mukesh Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26643 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar S/o Late Parasnath Prasad R/o Vill. - Sheoganj, P.S. - Ara Town, Dist. - Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Suman Devi W/o Mukesh Kumar R/o Mohalla Sheoganj, P.S. Ara Town, Dist. - Bhojpur.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 341, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The victim is in habit of instituting cases for similar offence against the petitioner and his family members.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26643 of 2018(2) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ara in connection with Mahila P.S. case No.115 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T