Smt. Radhika Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3506 of 2014 =========================================================== Smt. Radhika Devi, Wife of Chotan Paswan, Resident of Village- Kamasi, P.S. and District- Sheikhpura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Secretary, Registration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate-cum-Registrar, District- Sheikhpura.

4. The Divisional Commissioner, Munger.

5. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, (S.D.O.), District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Durgesh Nandan, A.A.G. 14 Mr. Umesh Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G. 14 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The Court is unable to understand as to what relief the petitioner claims as what has been stated in the writ petition is as under:

"(A) For that the petitioner has Apply before the Registrar to required a Registration under the Scheduled Tribes Fisheries Swavalambi Sahkarita Samittee Limited (hereinafter under the Registration Societies Act).

(B) For that the Respondent has not issued a Registration which has illegal held a committee and issued a Registration to name of five person without follow of guide line i.e. of Law."

3. Despite giving opportunity to learned counsel for the petitioner to satisfy, the only assistance is that the petitioner has

Patna High Court CWJC No.3506 of 2014 dt.12-09-2017 2/2 come for getting his Society registered. However, he submitted that the Society has been registered but instead of Block level, it has been registered as District level, which is not proper. Neither any order of the Court, pursuant to which the said order has been passed has been brought on record or even stated in the writ petition nor the said order passed pursuant to any such direction of the High Court is before the Court in the present writ application.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off.

5. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge any order passed by any authority by which he may be aggrieved with regard to the area of jurisdiction for which the Society has been registered, in accordance with law.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U