Daroga Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25900 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2018 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== DAROGA RAM Son of Sheobachan Ram Resident of Village - Bharigawan, P.S.- Kudara, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kudra P.S. Case No. 98/2018, instituted for offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of petitioner was rejected by this Court by order dated 24.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41846/2018 It is alleged in the written report that informant upon receiving information from his daughter that his son-in-law has assaulted her, he went to the house of his daughter, where she told him that her husband assaulted her. She requested the informant to take her along with him. It is further alleged that when informant asked from his son-in-law for taking his daughter with him, his son-in-law made pressure upon him to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25900 of 2019(5) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 sign on a blank paper and when he denied to sign on the blank paper, his son-in-law threatened him of dire consequences. It is further alleged that upon receiving information that his daughter has been hospitalized and is in unconscious state, he rushed there and found his daughter in dead condition having some black marks around her neck. The doctors of hospital referred her to Varanasi for better treatment, but she died on the way to Varanasi.

Report of the court below has been received wherein it is mentioned that trial is likely to be concluded within eight months.

In such circumstance, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected.

The trial court is directed to conclude the trial within nine months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

Petitioner is given liberty to renew prayer for bail in the event trial is not concluded within aforesaid period. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T