Lalit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3307 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3040 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Lalit Kumar Son of Late Ranbir Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Barman, P.O.- Barman, P.S.- Guraru at District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar (formal Party)

2. Md. Parvez Alam, The Commissione, of Excise Department (Govt. of Bihar) Deptt of Excise, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, at Patna - 800001

3. Smt. Renu Kumari Sinha, The Superintendent of Excise Deptt. Aurangabad at District- Aurangabad.

4. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - 800001 .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Acctt.Gen., Bihar : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2017 From the show cause filed by the respondents, it is seen that with regard to considering the case of the petitioner for grant of A.C.P., the representation of the petitioner has been rejected as it is found that he is not entitled to the grant of A.C.P. As far as the revision of pension and settlement of pensionary benefits of the petitioner are concerned, from the counter affidavit filed by the State Government and the office of the Accountant General, it is seen that after the orders were passed refusing the pension, the pension payment order have also been issued by the office of the Accountant General on 12th of January,

Patna High Court MJC No.3307 of 2014 dt.06-07-2017 2/2 2015 vide Annexure-C. The family pension amounting to Rs.5067/- and the pension payment order have been prepared after revision of pension, gratuity and other benefits payable to the petitioner. In view of the above, no further action is required to be taken in the matter.

In case actual monetary dues accruing to the petitioner by virtue of the order passed in the writ petition have not been received, respondent No.4 is directed to ensure payment of the same within two months.

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 15.7.2017 Transmission Date N/A