Savitri Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3426 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8094 of 2006 =========================================================== Savitri Das, wife of Late Subhash Narayan Das, son of Late Basudeo Prasad Das, resident of Village-Kamrauli, Post-Kausi, District-Darbhanga, at present, resident of Mohalla-Gopalpur, P.S.-Motihari Town, District-East Champaran at Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Anjani Kumar Sinha, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. D.S. Gangwar, the Secretary(Personnel & Administrative Department), Government of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Anil Kumar, the Additional Secretary, Personnel & Administrative Reform Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. Mr.

Rameshwar Singh, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna

6. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

7. Mr. Narmdeshwar Lal, the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

8. Mr. Abhay Kumar, The Collector(District Magistrate), East Champaran at Motihari .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anang Mohan Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. AVNISH NANDAN SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2017 On 11.05.2011 while disposing of C.W.J.C. No. 8094 of 2006 only direction issued was to settle the undisputed claim and with regard to the disputed claim, liberty was granted to the petitioner to file a detailed representation. The respondents have filed a show cause and from para 4 onwards, it is seen that undisputed claim has been settled and various reasons have been given as to why other claims cannot be

Patna High Court MJC No.3426 of 2014 dt.06-07-2017 2/2 settled.

That being the position, now with regard to the disputed claim even though the petitioner has tried to justify the same, the same cannot be decided in the contempt proceeding. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the action of the respondents in rejecting the disputed claims, in accordance with law. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11/07/2017 Transmission Date NA