Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28449/2020bail granted

Sonelal Mahato v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28449 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-423 Year-2020 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== SONELAL MAHATO S/o Nandu Mahato Resident of MohallaPaigambarpur Koluha, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2020 in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 423/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20/22 of the NDPS Act. As per the prosecution case, 1 kg and 10 small sachets of ganja was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. Charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2020 having no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph No. 3 of the petition. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail petition of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28449 of 2020(3) dt.11-01-2021 2/2 named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 423/2020, subject to following conditions:- (1)Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2)If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Saif/- U T