Salman Ansari @ Salman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30639 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2023 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Salman Ansari @ Salman SON OF ISRAIL MIAN @ IJRAIL MIAN @ MD.IZARAIL MIYA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SATIGHAT, P.S.- JHAJHA , DISTRICT - JAMUI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 397 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his son had gone to see a wrestling match at Akhara when all of a sudden, Sikandar came in a drunken condition and assaulted his son, thereafter Niyhzuddin Ansari assaulted him with lathi on his head with an intention to kill him, and next petitioner came armed with Bhujali (dagger) and assaulted him

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30639 of 2024(2) dt.25-07-2024 2/2 causing injury.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of injury report, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured on head is grievous and the injury on account of assault by dagger is simple in nature. 4.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting the injured by Bhujali (dagger), which is a sharp-edged weapon, the injury may be simple, but then the injury report also records cut on forehead. It is also submitted that all the accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant brutally. 5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T