Manoj Singh @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51802 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51802 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2017 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Manoj Singh @ Manoj Yadav, S/o Anant Singh, Resident of VillageChhulkar, P.S.-Sanghauli, Distt. Rohtas (Sasaram). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nasriganj (Rajpur) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2017, registered under Sections 384, 385, 395, 386 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj (Rohtas). The accusation is that the construction work was being done by the Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Limited under the contract of the informant. Sudama Yadav along with his wife, Sushila Devi, Jila Parishad of Rohtas, came on the spot and asked to Munsi to stop the construction work and also asked to meet the contractor to them. Thereafter, Sudama Yadav

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51802 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017 talked on mobile and demanded ransom in the night of 21/22.04.2017. Thereafter, Sudama Yadav, Manoj Yadav (petitioner) and others named in the F.I.R. came at the site and started firing, in which, several labourers and Munsi sustained injuries.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T