Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51322/2017bail granted

Ruby Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-08Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51322 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -430 Year- 2013 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ruby Devi, W/o Dharmendra Kumar,

2. Dharmendra Kumar S/o Surendra Ram,

3. Upendra Kumar S/o Surendra Ram, All R/o Village- Sadikpur, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Maner P.S. Case No. 430/13 instituted for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are family members of the husband of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners are allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 430/13, they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51322 of 2017 (2) dt.08-11-2017 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate I Class, Danapur, Patna subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and

(3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) Vinita/- U T