Shiv Dayal Kumar @ Sheo Dayal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28305 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3015 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== SHIV DAYAL KUMAR @ SHEO DAYAL KUMAR Son of Late Parma Choudhary Resident of Village- Hardiya Chowk, P.S.- Areraj, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Anchal Kumari D/o Suresh Choudhary Resident of Anwarpur East, P.S.- Hajipur Nagar, District- Vaishali.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh,Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Santosh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A)/494/420/408/34 of IPC.
Opposite party No.2 has already appeared. This is a case under Section 498A IPC There is chances of settlement between the parties, hence let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28305 of 2020(4) dt.17-03-2021 2/2 Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No.3015 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case and also the petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court , failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. The parties shall voluntarily appear before the learned court below on the date fixed for reconciliation. If the petitioner would be non-cooperative, the provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner shall be cancelled by the learned court below itself. If the wife would not cooperate in the settlement of dispute, the learned court below shall confirm the provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner. (Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T