Manish Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.58131 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2017 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Manish Kumar Pandey, Son of Late Sheojee Pandey, resident of VillageLakhawar P.S. Ghoshi, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dipak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341,323,447,506,504,379,307/34 of the IPC.
It is alleged in the written report that petitioner has assaulted the informant on his head with Farsa. The learned Sessions Judge in the impugned order has mentioned that from para 15 of the case diary, it would appear that the injury on the person of injured had a lacerated wound on right parietal region, simple in nature.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58131 of 2017 (2) dt.20-12-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 187 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T