Vikky Kumar @ Vikky Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27558 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2021 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== VIKKY KUMAR @ VIKKY SINGH S/o Ram Sewak Singh @ Ram Sewak Kumar R/o village- Jaitpur, P.S.- Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-05-2022 Heard Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
This is the second attempt for grant of regular bail on behalf of the petitioner inasmuch as earlier bail application of the petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 03.03.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42152/2021 with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after three months.
The allegation as per FIR, is that one loaded country made pistol along with five live cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2021 and while rejecting the application for bail of the petitioner, this Court had given liberty
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27558 of 2022(2) dt.26-05-2022 2/2 to renew the prayer for bail after three months. Learned counsel next submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter and there is no likelihood that the petitioner will abscond or will tamper with the evidences.
Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that this is the second attempt for bail on behalf of the petitioner, he remained in custody for more than one year i.e., since 08.04.2021 and the charge-sheet has been submitted in the matter and there is no likelihood that the petitioner will abscond or tamper with the evidences, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner, namely, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya PS Case No. 108/2021. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T