Md Muddin @ Muddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28926 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2022 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Md Muddin @ Muddin Son Of Md. Nasib @ Nasim Resident Of VillageMirganj Ps- Mirganj, Distt- Purnea 2.

Md. Rijwan Mansoori @ Md. Rijwan Ali @ Md. Rijwan Son Of Md Muddin Resident Of Village- Mirganj Ps- Mirganj, Distt- Purnea 3.

Munni Khatoon Wife Of Muddin Resident Of Village- Mirganj Ps- Mirganj, Distt- Purnea 4.

Soni Khatoon @ Soniya Bharti Wife Of Md Rijwan Mansoori @ Md Rijwanl Ali @ Md Rijwan Resident Of Village- Mirganj Ps- Mirganj, DisttPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP For the informant :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallik, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the accused persons including the petitioners is of torturing and causing death of the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28926 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 2/2 petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 are father-in-law, brother-in-law, motherin-law and sister-in-law (Gotani) of the deceased. They are separate in mess and property from husband of the deceased. They have got no concern with the alleged occurrence. The husband of the deceased is in custody.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 185 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioners do not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T