Smt. Vidya Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 931 of 2015 ====================================================== Smt. Vidya Kumari Wife of Hari Singh Yadav Resident of village - Bahpura, Ward No. 9, P.S. Ramgarh, District - Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar ) .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The District Magistrate, Kaimur, District Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar )
3. The Circle Officer, Bodh Kaimur, District Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar )
4. The District Welfare Officer, Kaimur, District Kaimur at Bhabhua (Bihar)
5. The District Programme Officer, Kaimur, District Kaimur at Bhabhua (Bihar )
6. The Child Development Project officer, Block Ramgarh, District Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar )
7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sisodha, Block Ramgarh, District Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar )
8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Sisodha, Block Ramgarh, District Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar )
9. Aradhana Devi Wife of Sunil Kumar Singh Resident of village - Bagari, P.S. Ramgarh, District - Kaimur at Bhabhua ( Bihar ) .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.
03-02-2017 Sri Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri Ramadhar Singh, learned Govt. Pleader - 25, submits that due to inadvertence, without availing appellate remedy of appeal, the petitioner has directly approached this Court. Accordingly, he makes a prayer for disposal of the present writ petition so that petitioner may avail appropriate remedy.
Patna High Court CWJC No.931 of 2015 (2) dt.03-02-2017 2/2 The prayer is allowed.
The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty, as indicated above.
It goes without saying that the period consumed by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 14-01-2015 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U