← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28851/2026bail granted

Roushan Singh @ Roushan Kr. Singh @ Roshan Singh @ Roshan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-01Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28851 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- Balwahat District- Saharsa ====================================================== Roushan Singh @ Roushan Kr. Singh @ Roshan Singh @ Roshan Kumar Singh Niranjan Singh alias Niranjan Kumar Singh R/o Village - Bhotia, Ward No. 01, PS - Balwahat, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Balwahat P.S. Case no.187 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons named in the FIR along with the petitioner entered the aangan of his house and started to misbehave with his daughter-in-law. The matter was reported to the police. Thereafter, it is stated that the five named accused persons came variously armed and amongst the accused, Ashok Singh and Niranjan Singh assaulted with an iron rod and butt of a rifle. There is allegation of assault against the petitioner and others also.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28851 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 13.1.2026 and the main reason that the application for bail has been rejected in the learned Court below is his having ten criminal antecedents. In a number of cases, the petitioner has been acquitted in the learned trial Court. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR together with the petitioner having remained in custody since 13.1.2026, the material that has transpired in course of investigation and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Balwahat P.S. Case no.187 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T