Kranti Kumari @ Kranti Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39059 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2020 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kranti Kumari @ Kranti Devi Daughter Of Teshlal Singh Resident Of Village- Ojhawalliya, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma- Sr. Advocate Mr. Suresh Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2023
1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that his son was married to the petitioner in the Year 2007 and there was marital discord. Further, on 16.06.2020, accused persons took his son at villageOjha Waliya for compromise, but on the same day, he received message that his son has been killed.
4. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39059 of 2021(7) dt.04-08-2023 2/3 submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case being wife of the deceased. It is next submitted that it is not in dispute that there was a marital discord and the petitioner had also instituted Mahila P. S. Case No.74 of 2017 under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. read with other Sections of the I.P.C., as such, there was no question of entering into any compromise, moreso, when petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and the entire allegation hinges around suspicion. It is also submitted that despite marital discord being there, no wife would want to become a widow.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Nasriganj P. S. Case No.96 of 2020, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39059 of 2021(7) dt.04-08-2023 3/3 the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T