Vikash Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30258 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2017 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. Vikash Yadav, Son of Deonath Yadav @ Devnath Singh,

2. Shobha Devi, Daughter of Deonath Yadav, Both resident of Village- Araura, Police Station- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 352 of 2017 registered for offences under sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation made of dowry against the petitioners. The victim girl has been killed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are Dewar and widow Nanad respectively and the husband of the victim girl is behind bar.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30258 of 2018(20) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 352 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T