Pushpa Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29528 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2018 Thana -SHAMBHUGANJ District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Pushpa Devi, Wife of Anil Yadav @ Anil Kumar, Resident of VillageBaidpur, P.S.- Shambhuganj, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 and 4/40 Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 and Sections 8, 4/21(1), 4/21(4A) of Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
The petitioner is owner of the tractor which was seized while committing illegal mining of sand. Submission is that the petitioner was not at the spot and he has got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29528 of 2018 (2) dt.31-05-2018 2/2 before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Shambhuganj Police Station Case No. 06 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No. 121 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
(Birendra Kumar, J) sushma/- U T