Rohit Sharma @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29035 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2023 Thana- BAUNSI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.
Rohit Sharma @ Rohit Kumar, son of Late Bhola Sharma, 2.
Fuliya Devi @ Fuli Devi, Wife of Late Bhola Sharma, 3.
Kailu Sharma, Son of Kusum Lal Sharma, 4.
Runiya Devi @ Runa Devi, wife of Jangla Sharma. 5.
Sukri Kumari @ Sarita Kumari, Daughter of Late Bhola Sharma All are residents of Village - Farkiya, Ward No. 08, P S- Bousi, DistrictAraria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bousi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2023 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and tried to outrage her modesty. They also assaulted the son and husband of the informant and took thumb impression of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29035 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. No occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken place. The FIR has been lodged after a delay of 3-4 days without any satisfactory explanation. No serious injury has been caused to the victims and this fact is evident from the rejection order wherein no specific injury has been mentioned. So it could be presumed that injuries are simple. The petitioners are having antecedent of one case and they are on bail in that case.
5. Learned APP vehemently opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioners.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the vague nature of allegation against the petitioners and further considering the possibility of false implication, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Araria, in connection with Bousi P.S. Case No. 150 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and other following
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29035 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.
(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the below, if so required by the learned trial court.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T