← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59867/2017bail granted

Amir Chandra Ram @ Amir Chand Ram @ Amir Chand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59867 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2017 Thana -RATANPURA District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. AMIR CHANDRA RAM @ AMIR CHAND RAM @ AMIR CHAND KUMAR, Son of Sri Jay Narayan Ram, Resident of Village+ P.O.- Dahgama, P.O.- Dumri, P.S.- Karjain, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that 263 litres of liquor is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused made before police as per F.I.R. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59867 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 263 litres of liquor is recovered nearby the purvi koshi Tatbandh. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No.40/2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T