Suraj Bhan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30432 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2021 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== SURAJ BHAN KUMAR S/o Ajit Sharma Resident of Village- Bhori, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on 14.02.2021 while he was going from his house to the house of Pramod Kumar, his Teacher, when he was surrounded by the accused persons including the petitioner near the house of Mithlesh Sharma and, thereafter, on orders of Sharmila Devi, it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head and he became unconscious.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30432 of 2022(2) dt.18-11-2022 2/2 of Annexure 3, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and this amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence nor the blow was repeated, it is next submitted that petitioner is a young boy of 22 years of age and if he is sent to custody his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 112 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

One of the bailor of the petitioner shall be his father Ajit Sharma.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T