Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58029/2017bail granted

Mangru Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-18Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58029 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2017 Thana -SURYAPURA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mangru Singh, son of Surendra Singh, resident of Village- Goshaldih, Police Station- Surypura, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Suryapura P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-377/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections-4 & 6 of POCSO Act. In the written report which has been filed by father of the victim, it is alleged that this petitioner committed unnatural offence with his son. The statement of son of the informant (victim) was recorded u/S 164 Cr.P.C., is annexed as Annexure-2 wherein the victim has clearly stated that this petitioner talked with him some dirty words and besides that, he did not do anything. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58029 of 2017 (2) dt.18-12-2017 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Suryapura P.S. Case No. 11 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Sasaram, Rohtas subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T