Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.903 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22468 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinay Kumar S/o Sri Upendra Prasad Residient of Village- Gopalpur, Maghra, P.S.- Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Ravindra Kumar The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, Veterinary College, Patna, Bihar.

4.

Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, The Secretary Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the BSSC :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate Mr. Kanupriya, Advocate Ms. Aastha Prakash, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Manish Kumar G.P.- 4 Mr. Ajay Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 The present contempt application has been filed alleging deliberate and willful violation of order dated 01.09.2021 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 22468 of 2019.

2. A review application was filed by the Staff Selection Commission Bihar Staff Selection Commission i.e. Res. Nos. 3 and 4 having Civil Review No. 4 of 2022.

3. The aforesaid review application has been allowed by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2025 and the original order dated 01.09.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 22468 of 2019 has

Patna High Court MJC No.903 of 2022(3) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 been modified to the extent that the writ petitioners shall not be entitled to appear in the interview as they did not secure the cutoff marks prescribed in their respective categories and were not eligible to be included in the list of candidates shortlisted for the proficiency test.

4. In view of the fact that original order has been reviewed, this contempt has become infructuous.

5. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Siwani/- U