← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26682/2025bail rejected

Md. Sikandar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-25Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26682 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2021 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Md. Sikandar, S/O Late Md Julfkar @ Kako Mian R/O Vill. And P.O.- Markana, Ps-Lachhuar, Dist-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2025

1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 168A of 2022, registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 341, 323, 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the trial of the petitioner is at the final stage, as the petitioner's statement who is an accused in Lachhuar P.S. Case No. 02 of 2021 has been recorded under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26682 of 2025(2) dt.25-04-2025 2/2 section 313 of Cr.P.C. and his trial is running separately.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid position revealed by the informant's counsel the trial court may be directed to expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest and the petitioner will cooperate in the trial for its expeditious disposal.

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and mainly present stage of petitioner's trial, his prayer is again rejected.

6. The trial court is directed to take steps for concluding the petitioner's trial in the next two months and send the compliance report to this Court.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T