Gohi Lal Rai @ Mohi Lal Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58291 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -240 Year- 2017 Thana -KADWA District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Gohi Lal Rai @ Mohi Lal Rai, Son of Late Ant Lal alias Antu Lal Rai, resident of Village- Shikarpur Mahinagar, P.S. Balia, Belon, DistrictKatihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Qumrul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Kadwa (Balia Belon) P.S. Case No. 240 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he caused injury to the informant in his thigh with brick. The injury caused on the head of the informant by Farsa is against co-accused Tulsi Kumar Rai. The injury report of the informant has been enclosed as Annexure-3 wherein the doctor has found swelling injury and one teeth bite over right thigh.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58291 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kadwa (Balia Belon) P.S. Case No. 240 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T