Babla Manjhi @ Pagla Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30180 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA MUFFSIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Babla Manjhi @ Pagla Manjhi, S/o Late Ajuba Manjhi, Resident of VillageManpur Pahadtali Bhuintoli, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinod Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 200 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the disclosure of co-accused Sudama Kumar Tnati. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 200 liters wine is recovered from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30180 of 2018(2) dt.15-05-2018 2/2 the tempo. The tempo in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Mufassil P.S. case No.41 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T