Arjun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28337 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -255 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Arjun Yadav S/o Late Bishwanath Yadav, R/o Vill.- Tirasi, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 255 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 385, 386, 387, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of demand of rangdari from the informant and snatching Rs. 10,000/-.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner and he has falsely been made accused in this case and allegation of snatching Rs. 10,000/- is against other accused person of this case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28337 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Udakishungaj, Madhepura, in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 255 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T