← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27611/2026allowed

Abhay Kumar @ Bobby v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27611 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2026 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== Abhay Kumar @ Bobby S/O Anirudh Singh R/o - Madarpur, PsBuniyadganj, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police has input that certain miscreants have gathered with stolen bike. One Dhiraj Kumar and Anant Kumar were apprehended. It is alleged that certain miscreants have fled away. Apprehended coaccused persons have named this petitioner is the person who has fled away.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27611 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 nothing has been recovered from his possession. His name has surfaced in the statement of the apprehended co-accused. It has further been submitted that other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 16963 of 2026. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.01.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Nawada in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 with the condition that petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and one of the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T