Raj Kishore Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30830 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2017 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ======================================================

1. RAJ KISHORE SINGH, son of Late Dasai Singh.

2. Fuljharo Devi, W/o Raj Kishore Singh, Both Resident of VillagePiro, Bihia Road Milki, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP 91 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 319 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel submits that petitioners are fatherin-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against both the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30830 of 2018(3) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 six weeks from today in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 319 of 2017 he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) eac with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Criminal Procedure Code with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) Shamshad/- U T