Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50389 of 2014 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2014 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Son of Bhola Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Nayatola, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna represented through its Managing Director. 3.

The Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4.

The Deputy General Manager, Electric Supply Area, Gaya. 5.

The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Gaya 6.

The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Jehanabad 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Rita Verma, APP For the BSPDC :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 7.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the following relief: " That this is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the F.I.R. contained in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 176/2014 instituted under Section 135 of Electricity Act against the petitioner."

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50389 of 2014 dt.27-03-2019 2/2

3. However, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to raise all points available to him, including those raised in the present application, before the Court below as well as the authorities concerned.

4. Learned A.P.P. does not oppose.

5. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

6. If the petitioner files any application before the Court below or the authority, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law, on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present order.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U T