Bhikhari Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57894 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -274 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHUBAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Bhikhari Ram, son of Late Udit Ram, resident of Village- Garahiya, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 274 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Section-354, 354A & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.
The occurrence has taken place due to dispute for Gali. The petitioner and the informant are co-villagers and Gotiyas. In the written report, there is general allegation against the petitioner that he entered into house of the informant with bad intention and touched her body.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57894 of 2017 (2) dt.11-12-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 274 of 2014 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, East Champaran, Motihari subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T