Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28862 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR SINGH @ RANJEET KUMAR SON OF KAUSHAL KUMAR SINGH R/O VILLAGE- MANDIH, P.S.- NARAYANPUR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

SHARDA DEVI D/O LALBABU SINGH AT PRESENT RESIDING AT VILLAGE- BAHUARA CHHAAPRA, P.S.- CHAURI, DISTRICTBHOJPUR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under sections 323, 379, 498A, 34 of the IPC and sections 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner, who is husband of the informant, is said to have committed torture upon the informant in association of his family members on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28862 of 2022(2) dt.08-09-2022 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has never made any dowry demand and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to grudge. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and he is ready and willing to keep his wife with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.

In that view of the matter, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Bhojpur Mahila P.S. Case No.66 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.3000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to opposite party no.2 in the first week of every month for her maintenance, as per the bank account details furnished by her in the learned Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28862 of 2022(2) dt.08-09-2022 3/3 Learned court below is directed to issue notice upon the O.P. No.2 and direct her to furnish her bank account details for deposit of the amount by the petitioner.

It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, opposite party no.2 shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T