Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29109/2018bail granted

Hanny Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-30Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29109 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2018 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Hanny Singh, son of Nand Kishore Singh, Resident of VillageBharhapur, P.S.- Awtar Nagar, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376(G), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of POCSO Act.

The victim girl in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., kept at page-26, has stated that she had love affair with the petitioner and she had voluntarily married with the petitioner and developed physical relationship with him. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29109 of 2018 (2) dt.30-05-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Saran Mahila Police Station Case No. 12 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) sushma/- U T