← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40972/2016bail granted

Ganauri Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-26Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40972 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2016 Thana -GOH District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ganauri Yadav, son of Late Lohadi Yadav

2. Banwari Yadav, son of Late Lohadi Yadav

3. Jageshwar Yadav, son of Late Lohadi Yadav

4. Bhuneshwar Yadav, son of Late Mathura Yadav

5. Chaneshwar Yadav @ Chuneshwar Yadav, son of Late Mathura Yadav

6. Mahendra Yadav, son of Bhuneshwar Yadav

7. Kavindra Yadav , son of Bhuneshwar Yadav

8. Ranjay Yadav @ Runjay Yadav @ Ranjay Kumar Yadav son of Ishwar Dayal Yadav

9. Dhananjay Yadav son of Muneshwar Yadav All resident of Village- Niyamatpur, P.S. Goh, District Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.6 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahtash Ali Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Goh Police Station Case No. 81 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 504, 385, 379, 307, 427 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that land dispute is the apparent reason leading to lodging of the First Information Report. He has also submitted that no person has received any

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40972 of 2016 (2) dt.26-09-2016 2/2 injury, which is evident from the First Information Report itself.

Learned Counsel appears to be right in his submission.

This application stands accordingly allowed.

Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, in connection with Goh Police Station Case No. 81 of 2016, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/-c U √ T √