← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31446/2024allowed

Prabhat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-21Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31446 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2013 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Prabhat Kumar Son of Late Chitranjan Thakur Resident of Village-Sherna , Police Station - Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar S.K., Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-05-2024 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Motipur PS. Case No.-316 of 2013, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case as emerges from the FIR is that there is allegation of assault on the head of the Informant by means of the butt of the country made pistol against accused persons. It is further alleged that the accused persons fled away taking the motorcycle and the bag of the informant.

4. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the case is lodged against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31446 of 2024(2) dt.21-05-2024 2/3 unknown. He was neither arrested on the spot nor any incriminating material has been recovered from his possession. He further submits that no Test Informant Parade has been conducted yet.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

7. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. A.C.J.M.II (West Muzaffarpur), in connection with Motipur PS. Case No.-316 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and on the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31446 of 2024(2) dt.21-05-2024 3/3 (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same. (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) Chandan/ shailendraU T