Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48980/2015dismissed

Vidya Nand Gupta And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-07Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48980 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -704 Year- 2008 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Vidya Nand Gupta, Son of late Shudhanand Gupta

2. Annumala Gupta, Wife of Vidya Nand Gupta

3. Raja Gupta, Son of Vidya Nand Gupta, All are Resident of Lala Basti , Bagdogra, P.s Naxalwari District Darzling (W.B)

4. Ajay Gupta Son of Sita Ram Gupta

5. Raju Gupta @ Raju Prasad, Son of Sita Ram Gupta Both are Resident of Bagdogra Telephon, P.s Bagdogra, District Darzling (W.B)

6. Kamta Prasad Singh son of Gopal Singh Resident of Bagdogra Bus Stand P.s Bagdogra, District Darzling (W.B) .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rajesh Kumar Ram Son of Shyam Narayan Ram Resident of VillageDusadh Patti Kajlamni , P.s+ District Kishanganj,(Bihar) .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lalit Narayan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Heard.

This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the order dated 29.05.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. C-704 of 2008, whereunder the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj summoned the accused-petitioners, on enquiry, under Section 204 of Cr.P.C. finding prima facie case under Sections 341, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. On going through the impugned order, I do not find any illegality amounting to abuse of process of Court for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48980 of 2015 (6) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 application is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise his point as raised herein before the trial court at appropriate stage.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T