Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30866/2026bail granted

Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30866 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar S/O Jayram Sah @ Jairam Sah Resident of Vilalge - Kasawa, Kadamwa, P.S. - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhurendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025 dated 20.04.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 31.03.2025 at about 7:00 PM, the accused persons, including the petitioner, allegedly entered the house of the informant and assaulted him and his family members by means of farsa, hammer, bricks, stones, and lathi-danda, causing injuries. The injured persons were taken to P.H.C., Ghorasahan and thereafter referred to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30866 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 Sadar Hospital, Motihari for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the injury alleged to have been caused to the informant has not been attributed to the present petitioner and that the allegations against him are general and omnibus in nature. The specific allegation of assault has been made against co-accused Vikash Kumar. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is a person of clean antecedents and is ready to cooperate with the investigation.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that no allegation of overt act has been levelled against the petitioner, rather the specific allegation of causing injury to the informant is against co-accused Vikash Kumar, and further considering that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30866 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaan at Motihari in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 119 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T